| Title |
Validation of Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination III for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia in Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Geriatrics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12877-019-1120-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shintaro Takenoshita, Seishi Terada, Hidenori Yoshida, Megumi Yamaguchi, Mayumi Yabe, Nao Imai, Makiko Horiuchi, Tomoko Miki, Osamu Yokota, Norihito Yamada |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 80 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,496,263
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#646
of 3,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,740
of 350,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.