↓ Skip to main content

Standardizing anesthesia medication drawers using human factors and quality assurance methods

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Standardizing anesthesia medication drawers using human factors and quality assurance methods
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, February 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12630-010-9274-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonas Shultz, Jan M. Davies, Jeff Caird, Susan Chisholm, Karen Ruggles, Raymond Puls

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 13%
Other 6 11%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 12 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Psychology 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,156,351
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#1,171
of 2,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,652
of 174,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.