| Title |
Quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow and extracellular volume fraction using 68Ga-DOTA-PET: A feasibility and validation study in large animals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12350-019-01694-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Velasco, Adriana Mota-Cobián, Rubén A Mota, Juan Pellico, Fernando Herranz, Carlos Galán-Arriola, Borja Ibáñez, Jesús Ruiz-Cabello, Jesús Mateo, Samuel España |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 17% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,836,793
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#251
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,162
of 364,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#7
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.