↓ Skip to main content

Root quality and decomposition environment, but not tree species richness, drive root decomposition in tropical forests

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
Title
Root quality and decomposition environment, but not tree species richness, drive root decomposition in tropical forests
Published in
Plant and Soil, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-2828-y
Authors

Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez, Dylan Craven, Christian Messier, Catherine Potvin, Benjamin L. Turner, I. Tanya Handa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 96 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Master 19 19%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 35%
Environmental Science 27 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,616,989
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#1,725
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,905
of 301,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#15
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.