Title |
Design and evaluation of an adaptive icon toolbar
|
---|---|
Published in |
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, March 1996
|
DOI | 10.1007/bf00126652 |
Authors |
Matjaz Debevc, Beth Meyer, Dali Donlagic, Rajko Svecko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Slovenia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 24% |
Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 15% |
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Other | 3 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 22 | 48% |
Engineering | 5 | 11% |
Psychology | 3 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
Design | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 6 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,191,555
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
#32
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,082
of 25,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them