| Title |
Animal models of generalized dystonia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neurotherapeutics, July 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1602/neurorx.2.3.504 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert S. Raike, H. A. Jinnah, Ellen J. Hess |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 13% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#948
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,085
of 67,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.