You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Viable and necrotic tumor assessment from whole slide images of osteosarcoma using machine-learning and deep-learning models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0210706 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harish Babu Arunachalam, Rashika Mishra, Ovidiu Daescu, Kevin Cederberg, Dinesh Rakheja, Anita Sengupta, David Leonard, Rami Hallac, Patrick Leavey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 15% |
| Engineering | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,342,527
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#88,398
of 197,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,104
of 350,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,258
of 2,828 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,828 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.