↓ Skip to main content

Index for subfactors

Overview of attention for article published in Inventiones mathematicae, February 1983
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
894 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Index for subfactors
Published in
Inventiones mathematicae, February 1983
DOI 10.1007/bf01389127
Authors

V. F. R. Jones

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Professor 7 17%
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Master 5 12%
Lecturer 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 28 68%
Physics and Astronomy 5 12%
Computer Science 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Unknown 6 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#6,373,631
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Inventiones mathematicae
#107
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,040
of 33,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inventiones mathematicae
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 33,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them