| Title |
A behavioural study of polarization vision in the fly, Musca domestica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Comparative Physiology A, December 1990
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00189764 |
| Authors |
Andreas von Philipsborn, Thomas Labhart |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2014.
All research outputs
#13,532,208
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#929
of 1,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,770
of 60,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology A
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.