| Title |
Modelling place memory in crickets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00422-009-0338-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Mangan, Barbara Webb |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 66 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 23% |
| Researcher | 18 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 15 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2016.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#574
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,095
of 94,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.