You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Virally-vectored vaccine candidates against white-nose syndrome induce anti-fungal immune response in little brown bats (Myotis lucifugus)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-43210-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tonie E. Rocke, Brock Kingstad-Bakke, Marcel Wüthrich, Ben Stading, Rachel C. Abbott, Marcos Isidoro-Ayza, Hannah E. Dobson, Lucas dos Santos Dias, Kevin Galles, Julia S. Lankton, Elizabeth A. Falendysz, Jeffrey M. Lorch, J. Scott Fites, Jaime Lopera-Madrid, J. Paul White, Bruce Klein, Jorge E. Osorio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| China | 1 | 4% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#252,694
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,951
of 142,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,191
of 366,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#67
of 2,996 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,996 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.