Title |
Eyetracking for two-person tasks with manipulation of a virtual world
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavior Research Methods, February 2010
|
DOI | 10.3758/brm.42.1.254 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jean Carletta, Robin L. Hill, Craig Nicol, Tim Taylor, Jan Peter de Ruiter, Ellen Gurman Bard |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Finland | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Poland | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 87 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 24% |
Researcher | 19 | 20% |
Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
Professor | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 31 | 32% |
Computer Science | 17 | 18% |
Engineering | 5 | 5% |
Linguistics | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 15% |
Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Research Methods
#1,037
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,264
of 172,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Research Methods
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.