| Title |
Comparison of two “a priori” risk assessment algorithms for preeclampsia in Italy: a prospective multicenter study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-019-05146-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniela Di Martino, Bianca Masturzo, Sara Paracchini, Benedetta Bracco, Paolo Cavoretto, Federico Prefumo, Chiara Germano, Danila Morano, Flavia Girlando, Veronica Giorgione, Giulia Parpinel, Luisa Cariello, Federica Fusè, Massimo Candiani, Tullia Todros, Nicola Rizzo, Antonio Farina |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2019.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,434
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,463
of 354,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#20
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.