↓ Skip to main content

18F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography may differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from less malignant gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
18F-Fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography may differentiate glioblastoma multiforme from less malignant gliomas
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00259-011-2037-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Hirata, Shunsuke Terasaka, Tohru Shiga, Naoya Hattori, Keiichi Magota, Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Shigeru Yamaguchi, Kiyohiro Houkin, Shinya Tanaka, Yuji Kuge, Nagara Tamaki

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor and its prognosis is significantly poorer than those of less malignant gliomas. Pathologically, necrosis is one of the most important characteristics that differentiate GBM from lower grade gliomas; therefore, we hypothesized that (18)F fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), a radiotracer for hypoxia imaging, accumulates in GBM but not in lower grade gliomas. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of FMISO positron emission tomography (PET) for the differential diagnosis of GBM from lower grade gliomas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 53 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 16%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Engineering 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 8 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2012.
All research outputs
#14,591,600
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1,749
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,822
of 252,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#16
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.