↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating regional climate model estimates against site-specific observed data in the UK

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating regional climate model estimates against site-specific observed data in the UK
Published in
Climatic Change, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10584-007-9382-9
Authors

M. Rivington, D. Miller, K. B. Matthews, G. Russell, G. Bellocchi, K. Buchan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Philippines 1 2%
France 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 26%
Environmental Science 10 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 24%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2016.
All research outputs
#5,896,747
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#3,333
of 5,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,252
of 80,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.