| Title |
Early Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Versus Thoracoscopic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07273-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yajie Zhang, Yu Han, Qinyi Gan, Jie Xiang, Runsen Jin, Kai Chen, Jiaming Che, Junbiao Hang, Hecheng Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 58% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Design | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 17 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2019.
All research outputs
#4,634,869
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,465
of 6,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,277
of 352,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#51
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.