You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The historical development of pharmacopoeias and the inclusion of exotic herbal drugs with a focus on Europe and Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Ethnopharmacology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jep.2019.111891 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Domingos Tabajara de Oliveira Martins, Eliana Rodrigues, Laura Casu, Guillermo Benítez, Marco Leonti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#1,148
of 7,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,772
of 347,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnopharmacology
#15
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.