You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genetic diversity of tumors with mismatch repair deficiency influences anti–PD-1 immunotherapy response
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.aau0447 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rajarsi Mandal, Robert M Samstein, Ken-Wing Lee, Jonathan J Havel, Hao Wang, Chirag Krishna, Erich Y Sabio, Vladimir Makarov, Fengshen Kuo, Pedro Blecua, Apoorva T Ramaswamy, Jennifer N Durham, Bjarne Bartlett, Xiaoxiao Ma, Raghvendra Srivastava, Sumit Middha, Ahmet Zehir, Jaclyn F Hechtman, Luc Gt Morris, Nils Weinhold, Nadeem Riaz, Dung T Le, Luis A Diaz, Timothy A Chan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 279 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 85 | 30% |
Spain | 20 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 12 | 4% |
France | 10 | 4% |
Italy | 8 | 3% |
Canada | 4 | 1% |
Brazil | 3 | 1% |
Turkey | 3 | 1% |
Comoros | 3 | 1% |
Other | 37 | 13% |
Unknown | 94 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 139 | 50% |
Scientists | 104 | 37% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 419 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 103 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 13% |
Other | 43 | 10% |
Student > Master | 24 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 6% |
Other | 58 | 14% |
Unknown | 112 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 93 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 19% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 11% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 31 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 2% |
Other | 28 | 7% |
Unknown | 134 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#160,009
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Science
#4,831
of 83,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,175
of 364,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#128
of 1,132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.