↓ Skip to main content

NBR1 enables autophagy-dependent focal adhesion turnover

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cell Biology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NBR1 enables autophagy-dependent focal adhesion turnover
Published in
Journal of Cell Biology, February 2016
DOI 10.1083/jcb.201503075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Candia M. Kenific, Samantha J. Stehbens, Juliet Goldsmith, Andrew M. Leidal, Nathalie Faure, Jordan Ye, Torsten Wittmann, Jayanta Debnath

Abstract

Autophagy is a catabolic pathway involving the sequestration of cellular contents into a double-membrane vesicle, the autophagosome. Although recent studies have demonstrated that autophagy supports cell migration, the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Using live-cell imaging, we uncover that autophagy promotes optimal migratory rate and facilitates the dynamic assembly and disassembly of cell-matrix focal adhesions (FAs), which is essential for efficient motility. Additionally, our studies reveal that autophagosomes associate with FAs primarily during disassembly, suggesting autophagy locally facilitates the destabilization of cell-matrix contact sites. Furthermore, we identify the selective autophagy cargo receptor neighbor of BRCA1 (NBR1) as a key mediator of autophagy-dependent FA remodeling. NBR1 depletion impairs FA turnover and decreases targeting of autophagosomes to FAs, whereas ectopic expression of autophagy-competent, but not autophagy-defective, NBR1 enhances FA disassembly and reduces FA lifetime during migration. Our findings provide mechanistic insight into how autophagy promotes migration by revealing a requirement for NBR1-mediated selective autophagy in enabling FA disassembly in motile cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 170 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 19%
Researcher 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 52 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 14 8%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,805,949
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cell Biology
#5,499
of 11,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,923
of 298,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cell Biology
#46
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.