↓ Skip to main content

Computational investigation of Au·H hydrogen bonds involving neutral AuIN-heterocyclic carbene complexes and amphiprotic binary hydrides

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Modeling, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Computational investigation of Au·H hydrogen bonds involving neutral AuIN-heterocyclic carbene complexes and amphiprotic binary hydrides
Published in
Journal of Molecular Modeling, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00894-019-4018-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ferdinand Groenewald, Helgard G. Raubenheimer, Jan Dillen, Catharine Esterhuysen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 2 29%
Social Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,679,530
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#532
of 827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,976
of 349,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Modeling
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 827 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.