You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Oral Mucosal Organoids as a Potential Platform for Personalized Cancer Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-18-1522 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Else Driehuis, Sigrid Kolders, Sacha Spelier, Kadi Lõhmussaar, Stefan M. Willems, Lot A. Devriese, Remco de Bree, Emma J. de Ruiter, Jeroen Korving, Harry Begthel, Johan H. van Es, Veerle Geurts, Gui-Wei He, Richard H. van Jaarsveld, Rurika Oka, Mauro J. Muraro, Judith Vivié, Maurice M.J.M. Zandvliet, Antoni P.A. Hendrickx, Nino Iakobachvili, Priya Sridevi, Onno Kranenburg, Ruben van Boxtel, Geert J.P.L. Kops, David A. Tuveson, Peter J. Peters, Alexander van Oudenaarden, Hans Clevers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| France | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 39% |
| Scientists | 9 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 340 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 15% |
| Researcher | 51 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 112 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 83 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 6% |
| Unknown | 130 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 79. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#551,183
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#292
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,569
of 366,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#3
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.