| Title |
Use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the interpretation of intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00404-019-05151-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacques Balayla, Guy Shrem |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Equatorial Guinea | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#13,227,940
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#932
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,124
of 351,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#5
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.