↓ Skip to main content

Credibility of statistical downscaling under nonstationary climate

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Credibility of statistical downscaling under nonstationary climate
Published in
Climate Dynamics, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00382-015-2688-9
Authors

Kaustubh Salvi, Subimal Ghosh, Auroop R. Ganguly

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 83 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 33%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 18 20%
Environmental Science 12 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 14 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#3,217
of 4,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,358
of 266,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#57
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,590 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.