| Title |
Nanomaterial inhalation exposure from nanotechnology-based cosmetic powders: a quantitative assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-012-1229-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yevgen Nazarenko, Huajun Zhen, Taewon Han, Paul J. Lioy, Gediminas Mainelis |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 5 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#248
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,763
of 172,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.