| Title |
Use of the fractal dimension for the analysis of electroencephalographic time series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Cybernetics, November 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s004220050394 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Accardo, M. Affinito, M. Carrozzi, F. Bouquet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 190 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 60 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 23 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2015.
All research outputs
#12,947,444
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Biological Cybernetics
#455
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,611
of 31,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Cybernetics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 31,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them