↓ Skip to main content

Does acromegaly enhance mortality?

Overview of attention for article published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Does acromegaly enhance mortality?
Published in
Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11154-007-9067-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Ayuk, Michael C. Sheppard

Abstract

The increased mortality associated with acromegaly was first demonstrated in early epidemiological studies. Since the seminal paper by Wright et al. in 1970, nearly 20 studies have analyzed mortality rates in over 5,000 patients with acromegaly. Overall standardized mortality rates are approximately two times higher than in the general population, relating to an average reduction in life expectancy of around 10 years. The excess deaths are due predominantly to cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and respiratory disease. Malignancy deaths have been high in some studies but not others; in the largest series looking at cancer mortality in acromegaly, overall cancer deaths were not increased, but colon cancer mortality was higher than expected. In 1993, Bates et al. first demonstrated that outcome was related to the latest measurable growth hormone (GH), and treatment to reduce GH levels led to improved outcomes. Other factors predicting poor outcome include the presence of hypertension and diabetes. On the basis of current evidence, a latest GH of less than 2-2.5 mug/L is a better predictor of good outcome than a normal insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), possibly due to discrepancy between GH and IGF-1 at low GH levels. There is some evidence to suggest a more stringent GH cut-off (less than 1 mug/L) may yield additional benefit but further studies are required to investigate any added risk of increased mortality from hypopituitarism. Radiotherapy has been linked specifically to cerebrovascular mortality and its use in patients with acromegaly must involve a careful risk-benefit analysis in each case.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 19%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,207,823
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#52
of 505 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,653
of 161,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 505 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them