↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral gene interaction hierarchy analysis of the cell death gene response emphasizes the significance of cell cycle genes following unilateral traumatic brain injury

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Bilateral gene interaction hierarchy analysis of the cell death gene response emphasizes the significance of cell cycle genes following unilateral traumatic brain injury
Published in
BMC Genomics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2412-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Todd E. White, Monique C. Surles-Zeigler, Gregory D. Ford, Alicia S. Gates, Benem Davids, Timothy Distel, Michelle C. LaPlaca, Byron D. Ford

Abstract

Delayed or secondary cell death that is caused by a cascade of cellular and molecular processes initiated by traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be reduced or prevented if an effective neuroprotective strategy is employed. Microarray and subsequent bioinformatic analyses were used to determine which genes, pathways and networks were significantly altered 24 h after unilateral TBI in the rat. Ipsilateral hemi-brain, the corresponding contralateral hemi-brain, and naïve (control) brain tissue were used for microarray analysis. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis showed cell death and survival (CD) to be a top molecular and cellular function associated with TBI on both sides of the brain. One major finding was that the overall gene expression pattern suggested an increase in CD genes in ipsilateral brain tissue and suppression of CD genes contralateral to the injury which may indicate an endogenous protective mechanism. We created networks of genes of interest (GOI) and ranked the genes by the number of direct connections each had in the GOI networks, creating gene interaction hierarchies (GIHs). Cell cycle was determined from the resultant GIHs to be a significant molecular and cellular function in post-TBI CD gene response. Cell cycle and apoptosis signalling genes that were highly ranked in the GIHs and exhibited either the inverse ipsilateral/contralateral expression pattern or contralateral suppression were identified and included STAT3, CCND1, CCND2, and BAX. Additional exploration into the remote suppression of CD genes may provide insight into neuroprotective mechanisms that could be used to develop therapies to prevent cell death following TBI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 11 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Energy 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2016.
All research outputs
#17,789,675
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#7,572
of 10,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,146
of 298,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#192
of 234 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,658 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 234 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.