| Title |
Brazilian native species of Gracilaria (Gracilariales, Rhodophyta) as a source of valuable compounds and as nutritional supplements
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Phycology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10811-019-01804-x |
| Authors |
Priscila Torres, Alice Nagai, Dárlio Inácio Alves Teixeira, Eliane Marinho-Soriano, Fungyi Chow, Deborah Y. A. C. dos Santos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,043,397
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Phycology
#911
of 2,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,665
of 349,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Phycology
#8
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,566 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,745 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.