↓ Skip to main content

The application of in vitro cell-free conversion systems to human prion diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The application of in vitro cell-free conversion systems to human prion diseases
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, June 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00401-010-0708-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Jones, Alexander H. Peden, Mark W. Head, James W. Ironside

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 5%
Czechia 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,364
of 2,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,160
of 96,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.