↓ Skip to main content

Enzymatic approaches and bisulfite sequencing cannot distinguish between 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechniques, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enzymatic approaches and bisulfite sequencing cannot distinguish between 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in DNA
Published in
Biotechniques, April 2010
DOI 10.2144/000113403
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colm Nestor, Alexey Ruzov, Richard R. Meehan, Donncha S. Dunican

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 34%
Researcher 28 21%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Professor 7 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 16 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 8%
Chemistry 5 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 17 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,806,088
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Biotechniques
#320
of 2,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,659
of 103,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechniques
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.