You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Invasive vs Conservative Treatment Strategies in Women and Men With Unstable Angina and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.300.1.71 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michelle O’Donoghue, William E. Boden, Eugene Braunwald, Christopher P. Cannon, Tim C. Clayton, Robbert J. de Winter, Keith A. A. Fox, Bo Lagerqvist, Peter A. McCullough, Sabina A. Murphy, Rudolf Spacek, Eva Swahn, Lars Wallentin, Fons Windhausen, Marc S. Sabatine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 25% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 59% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 48 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,071,042
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#15,186
of 36,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,410
of 95,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#49
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.