↓ Skip to main content

Urban forest governance and decision-making: A systematic review and synthesis of the perspectives of municipal managers

Overview of attention for article published in Landscape & Urban Planning, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urban forest governance and decision-making: A systematic review and synthesis of the perspectives of municipal managers
Published in
Landscape & Urban Planning, September 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.04.020
Authors

Camilo Ordóñez, Caragh G. Threlfall, Dave Kendal, Dieter F. Hochuli, Melanie Davern, Richard A. Fuller, Rodney van der Ree, Stephen J. Livesley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 4%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 70 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 48 23%
Social Sciences 25 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 12%
Engineering 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 74 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,998,304
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Landscape & Urban Planning
#445
of 2,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,624
of 349,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape & Urban Planning
#14
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.