| Title |
Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fungal Diversity, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13225-019-00421-w |
| Authors |
Rungtiwa Phookamsak, Kevin D. Hyde, Rajesh Jeewon, D. Jayarama Bhat, E. B. Gareth Jones, Sajeewa S. N. Maharachchikumbura, Olivier Raspé, Samantha C. Karunarathna, Dhanushka N. Wanasinghe, Sinang Hongsanan, Mingkwan Doilom, Danushka S. Tennakoon, Alexandre R. Machado, André L. Firmino, Aniket Ghosh, Anuruddha Karunarathna, Armin Mešić, Arun Kumar Dutta, Benjarong Thongbai, Bandarupalli Devadatha, Chada Norphanphoun, Chanokned Senwanna, Deping Wei, Dhandevi Pem, Frank Kwekucher Ackah, Gen-Nuo Wang, Hong-Bo Jiang, Hugo Madrid, Hyang Burm Lee, Ishani D. Goonasekara, Ishara S. Manawasinghe, Ivana Kušan, Josep Cano, Josepa Gené, Junfu Li, Kanad Das, Krishnendu Acharya, K. N. Anil Raj, K. P. Deepna Latha, K. W. Thilini Chethana, Mao-Qiang He, Margarita Dueñas, Margita Jadan, María P. Martín, Milan C. Samarakoon, Monika C. Dayarathne, Mubashar Raza, Myung Soo Park, M. Teresa Telleria, Napalai Chaiwan, Neven Matočec, Nimali I. de Silva, Olinto L. Pereira, Paras Nath Singh, Patinjareveettil Manimohan, Priyanka Uniyal, Qiu-Ju Shang, Rajendra P. Bhatt, Rekhani H. Perera, Renato Lúcio Mendes Alvarenga, Sandra Nogal-Prata, Sanjay K. Singh, Santhiti Vadthanarat, Seung-Yoon Oh, Shi-Ke Huang, Shiwali Rana, Sirinapa Konta, Soumitra Paloi, Subashini C. Jayasiri, Sun Jeong Jeon, Tahir Mehmood, Tatiana Baptista Gibertoni, Thuong T. T. Nguyen, Upendra Singh, Vinodhini Thiyagaraja, V. Venkateswara Sarma, Wei Dong, Xian-Dong Yu, Yong-Zhong Lu, Young Woon Lim, Yun Chen, Zdenko Tkalčec, Zhi-Feng Zhang, Zong-Long Luo, Dinushani A. Daranagama, Kasun M. Thambugala, Saowaluck Tibpromma, Erio Camporesi, Timur S. Bulgakov, Asha J. Dissanayake, Indunil C. Senanayake, Dong Qin Dai, Li-Zhou Tang, Sehroon Khan, Huang Zhang, Itthayakorn Promputtha, Lei Cai, Putarak Chomnunti, Rui-Lin Zhao, Saisamorn Lumyong, Saranyaphat Boonmee, Ting-Chi Wen, Peter E. Mortimer, Jianchu Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Colombia | 1 | 25% |
| Croatia | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 138 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 63 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#6,445,464
of 24,450,293 outputs
Outputs from Fungal Diversity
#70
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,600
of 355,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fungal Diversity
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,450,293 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.