↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the Toxicity of Airborne Particulate Matter and Nanoparticles by Measuring Oxidative Stress Potential—A Workshop Report and Consensus Statement

Overview of attention for article published in Inhalation Toxicology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
478 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the Toxicity of Airborne Particulate Matter and Nanoparticles by Measuring Oxidative Stress Potential—A Workshop Report and Consensus Statement
Published in
Inhalation Toxicology, October 2008
DOI 10.1080/08958370701665517
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon G. Ayres, Paul Borm, Flemming R. Cassee, Vincent Castranova, Ken Donaldson, Andy Ghio, Roy M. Harrison, Robert Hider, Frank Kelly, Ingeborg M. Kooter, Francelyne Marano, Robert L. Maynard, Ian Mudway, Andre Nel, Constantinos Sioutas, Steve Smith, Armelle Baeza-Squiban, Art Cho, Sean Duggan, John Froines

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 297 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 23%
Student > Master 42 14%
Researcher 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 54 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 14%
Chemistry 28 9%
Engineering 16 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 5%
Other 60 20%
Unknown 90 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2012.
All research outputs
#8,135,949
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Inhalation Toxicology
#340
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,100
of 94,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inhalation Toxicology
#171
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.