↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the treatment performance and microbial communities of a combined constructed wetland used to treat industrial park wastewater

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the treatment performance and microbial communities of a combined constructed wetland used to treat industrial park wastewater
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6181-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Xu, Weijing Liu, Chao Li, Chun Xiao, Lili Ding, Ke Xu, Jinju Geng, Hongqiang Ren

Abstract

Constructed wetlands are ecosystems that use plants and microorganisms to remediate pollution in soil and water. In this study, two parallel pilot-scale vertical flow wetland and horizontal flow wetland (VF-HF) systems were implemented to investigate the treatment performance and microorganism community structure in the secondary effluent of an industrial park wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with a loading rate of 100 mm/day near the Yangtze River in Suzhou City, East China. Removal efficiencies of 82.3, 69.8, 77.8, and 32.3 were achieved by the VF-HF systems for ammonium nitrogen (NH4 (+)-N), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and chemical oxygen demand (COD), respectively. The VF system specialized in COD and NH4 (+)-N removal (73.6 and 79.2 %), whereas the HF system mainly contributed to TN removal (63.5 %). The effluents in all seasons are capable of achieving the "surface water environmental quality standard" (GB3838-2002) grade IV. In the VF system, the 16S gene and nirK gene were significantly correlated with depth, with the 16S gene showing significant correlations with the dissolved oxygen (DO) level (r = 0.954, p < 0.05), which was determined by real-time PCR and high-throughput sequencing. Many types of bacteria capable of biodegradation, including nitrifiers, denitrifiers, and polyaromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) degraders (improvement of the BOD5/COD ratio), were observed, and they contributed to approximately 90 % of the nitrogen removal in the VF-HF system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 8 21%
Environmental Science 6 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,129,652
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,136
of 9,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,013
of 302,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#26
of 196 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,883 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 196 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.