↓ Skip to main content

An analysis of the contribution rules of Japanese academic journals in the field of humanities and social science (I)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An analysis of the contribution rules of Japanese academic journals in the field of humanities and social science (I)
Published in
Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri, January 2007
DOI 10.1241/johokanri.49.564
Authors

Setsuko FUJITA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#15,025,469
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#479
of 954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,085
of 169,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Information Processing & Management / Joho Kanri
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.