Title |
Osseous choristoma of the tongue: two case reports
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, March 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13256-016-0840-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bhoj Raj Adhikari, Jun Sato, Tetsuro Morikawa, June Obara-Itoh, Masafumi Utsunomiya, Fumiya Harada, Takatoshi Chujo, Rie Takai, Koki Yoshida, Michiko Nishimura, Mamata Shakya, Hiroki Nagayasu, Yoshihiro Abiko |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 27% |
Other | 1 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 64% |
Chemistry | 1 | 9% |
Psychology | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2020.
All research outputs
#7,590,701
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#642
of 3,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,097
of 327,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#16
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,977 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.