↓ Skip to main content

Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Problem Gambling in a General Population Sample

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory and Problem Gambling in a General Population Sample
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10899-019-09850-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Farrell, Benjamin R. Walker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Engineering 2 5%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#866
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,109
of 362,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.