↓ Skip to main content

So Similar, So Different, So Chinese: Analytical Comparisons of the Confucius Institute with its Western Counterparts

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies Review, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
So Similar, So Different, So Chinese: Analytical Comparisons of the Confucius Institute with its Western Counterparts
Published in
Asian Studies Review, April 2019
DOI 10.1080/10357823.2019.1584602
Authors

Xin Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 18 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 12 33%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#3,235,196
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#60
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,661
of 357,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.