↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy and evaluation of irradiation of novel localization devices with unique three-dimensional structures in microendoscopic spine surgery

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Accuracy and evaluation of irradiation of novel localization devices with unique three-dimensional structures in microendoscopic spine surgery
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00590-016-1747-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masanari Takami, Amr Elwany, Jean Destandau

Abstract

Although many reports are available on using a variety of instruments and techniques to prevent wrong-level spine surgery, the accurate localization of the correct spinal level remains problematic. At the same time, surgeons are also required to reduce radiation exposure to patients and operating room personnel. To solve these problems, we developed and used specially designed marking devices with a unique three-dimensional structure. To evaluate the accuracy of our novel devices for localization of the spinal level to prevent wrong-level surgery and reduce the amount and time of radiation exposure during surgery. This was a retrospective cohort study. In 8240 consecutive patients who underwent microendoscopic spine surgery between 1993 and 2012, the incidence of wrong-level surgery was studied. In addition, the amount of radiation exposure and total fluoroscopy time were measured in recent 100 consecutive patients using a digital dosimeter attached to the fluoroscope. Eight (0.097 %) patients had undergone wrong-level surgery. The average radiation exposure was 0.26 mGy (range 0.10-1.15 mGy), and the average total fluoroscopy time was 3.1 s (range 1-7 s). Our novel localization devices and technique for their use in spine surgery are reliable and accurate for identifying the target level and contributed to reductions in preoperative localization error and radiation exposure to patients and operating room personnel.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 20%
Engineering 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2016.
All research outputs
#20,310,658
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#541
of 877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,335
of 298,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 877 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.