↓ Skip to main content

Seed predation by bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Kokolopori, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Seed predation by bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Kokolopori, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Published in
Primates, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10329-011-0256-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander V. Georgiev, Melissa Emery Thompson, Albert Lotana Lokasola, Richard W. Wrangham

Abstract

We compared the feeding ecology of the Hali-Hali community of bonobos (Pan paniscus) at Kokolopori, a new field site in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, between two periods 5 months apart. During the first study period (SP1), bonobos relied heavily on the dry seeds of Guibourtia (Caesalpiniaceae), mostly eaten from the ground. The second period (SP2) was characterized by high consumption of ripe tree fruit. Terrestrial herbaceous vegetation (THV) contributed little to the diet in either study period. The low amount of ripe fruit and the high reliance on seeds in the diet during SP1 were associated with high cortisol production and low levels of urinary C-peptide in females, suggesting nutritional stress. However, female gregariousness was not constrained during the fruit-poor period, probably because high seed abundance on the ground ameliorated scramble feeding competition. This is the first description of extensive seed predation by bonobos. It suggests that bonobo feeding ecology may be more similar to that of chimpanzees than previously recognized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 52%
Environmental Science 7 11%
Social Sciences 6 10%
Arts and Humanities 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 8 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,410,944
of 23,322,966 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#460
of 1,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,559
of 122,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them