↓ Skip to main content

Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Causes of ambiguity aversion: Known versus unknown preferences
Published in
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s11166-008-9038-9
Authors

Stefan T. Trautmann, Ferdinand M. Vieider, Peter P. Wakker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 193 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 21 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 6%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 51 24%
Psychology 48 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 29 14%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Neuroscience 7 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,701,276
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#193
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,772
of 89,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.