↓ Skip to main content

Microbial functional amyloids serve diverse purposes for structure, adhesion and defence

Overview of attention for article published in Biophysical Reviews, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Microbial functional amyloids serve diverse purposes for structure, adhesion and defence
Published in
Biophysical Reviews, May 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12551-019-00526-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nirukshan Shanmugam, Max O. D. G. Baker, Sarah R. Ball, Megan Steain, Chi L. L. Pham, Margaret Sunde

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Chemistry 6 7%
Environmental Science 5 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 24 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2019.
All research outputs
#13,958,618
of 23,144,579 outputs
Outputs from Biophysical Reviews
#236
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,460
of 350,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biophysical Reviews
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,144,579 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.