| Title |
Multiple centrality corrections in a primal-dual method for linear programming
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computational Optimization and Applications, September 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00249643 |
| Authors |
Jacek Gondzio |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 11 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 19% |
| Engineering | 11 | 19% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2008.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Computational Optimization and Applications
#29
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,863
of 29,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Optimization and Applications
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them