| Title |
A Randomized Trial Evaluating Bioimpedance Spectroscopy Versus Tape Measurement for the Prevention of Lymphedema Following Treatment for Breast Cancer: Interim Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-019-07344-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheila H. Ridner, Mary S. Dietrich, Michael S. Cowher, Bret Taback, Sarah McLaughlin, Nicolas Ajkay, John Boyages, Louise Koelmeyer, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Jamie Wagner, Vandana Abramson, Andrew Moore, Chirag Shah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 48% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
| Scientists | 5 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 20% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#262,126
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#27
of 7,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,375
of 364,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.