↓ Skip to main content

Long-term effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls

Overview of attention for article published in Reading and Writing, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
Title
Long-term effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls
Published in
Reading and Writing, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11145-011-9323-x
Authors

Rhona S. Johnston, Sarah McGeown, Joyce E. Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 190 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 22%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 48 25%
Psychology 37 19%
Linguistics 28 14%
Arts and Humanities 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 44 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,923,620
of 25,002,811 outputs
Outputs from Reading and Writing
#51
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,184
of 116,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reading and Writing
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,002,811 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.