| Title |
Healed Culprit Plaques in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.093 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Fracassi, Filippo Crea, Tomoyo Sugiyama, Erika Yamamoto, Shiro Uemura, Rocco Vergallo, Italo Porto, Hang Lee, James Fujimoto, Valentin Fuster, Ik-Kyung Jang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 12% |
| Argentina | 10 | 11% |
| Mexico | 8 | 9% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 16% |
| Scientists | 12 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 42% |
| Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#850,157
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,133
of 16,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,844
of 366,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#86
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.