| Title |
Post-depositional fracturing and subsidence of pumice flow deposits: Lascar Volcano, Chile
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Volcanology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00445-011-0545-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick L. Whelley, J. Jay, E. S. Calder, M. E. Pritchard, N. J. Cassidy, S. Alcaraz, A. Pavez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 33 | 60% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Volcanology
#385
of 1,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,011
of 131,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Volcanology
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,087 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.