You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Wnt canonical pathway activates macropinocytosis and lysosomal degradation of extracellular proteins
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1903506116 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nydia Tejeda-Muñoz, Lauren V. Albrecht, Maggie H. Bui, Edward M. De Robertis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Georgia | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 73% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,327,553
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#42,862
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,224
of 355,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#602
of 952 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 952 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.