↓ Skip to main content

異分野連携研究における研究基盤データ構築への市民参加の可能性:参加 型ワークショップ「古典オーロラハンター」を事例として

Overview of attention for article published in Stars and Galaxies, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
異分野連携研究における研究基盤データ構築への市民参加の可能性:参加 型ワークショップ「古典オーロラハンター」を事例として
Published in
Stars and Galaxies, March 2019
DOI 10.32231/starsandgalaxies.1.0_51
Authors

岩橋 清美, 玉澤 春史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,667,544
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Stars and Galaxies
#6
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,272
of 368,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stars and Galaxies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them